linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mtd: rawnand: support MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180706233701.05da0666@bbrezillon>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jul 2018 23:37:01 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, computersforpeace@...il.com,
        dwmw2@...radead.org, "Bean Huo \(beanhuo\)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mtd: rawnand: support MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F

On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 21:27:20 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:44:42 +1200
> Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm looking at adding support for the Micron MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F chip  
> 
> Hm, it's even worse than I thought. The model name does not include the
> -ITE suffix (E means ECC can't be disabled), which means we have no way
> to detect the version with forced on-die ECC.
> 
> I see 2 solutions to this problem:
> 1/ Bean provides us a solution to reliably detect when ECC can be
>    de-actived and when it can't
> 2/ We only ever expose 64 bytes of OOB to the user and consider that
>    ECC can be disabled, even if it can't in reality
>

After reading the doc again, I forgot one thing you can try before
deciding to go for option #2.

8th bit in byte 5 of READID's result encodes whether the on-die ECC
state (enabled or not). I remember we had a discussion with Bean where
he told us this was a runtime status reflecting the on-die ECC state,
which is crazy, since READID might return different values depending on
the NAND state, and most of the code in the core assumes READID
provides a fixed ID that encodes the chip characteristics/capabilities,
not its state.

Anyway, if this bit is actually reflecting the on-die ECC state and
on-die cannot be disabled on your chip, it should stay at 1 even after
you have sent the SET_FEATURES(DISABLE_ECC) command. Let's hope this
works as I expect, otherwise we're back to option #2 until Bean suggest
something else.