lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180706224533.GC77984@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jul 2018 15:45:33 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: split discard command in prior to block layer

On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote:
> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> 
> Some devices has small max_{hw,}discard_sectors, so that in
> __blkdev_issue_discard(), one big size discard bio can be split
> into multiple small size discard bios, result in heavy load in IO
> scheduler and device, which can hang other sync IO for long time.
> 
> Now, f2fs is trying to control discard commands more elaboratively,
> in order to make less conflict in between discard IO and user IO
> to enhance application's performance, so in this patch, we will
> split discard bio in f2fs in prior to in block layer to reduce
> issuing multiple discard bios in a short time.

Hi Chao,

In terms of # of candidates, can we control this when actually issuing
the discard commands?

Thanks,

> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    | 13 ++++++-------
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index a9da5a089cb4..a09d2b2d9520 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ enum {
>  
>  #define MAX_DISCARD_BLOCKS(sbi)		BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi)
>  #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST		8	/* issue 8 discards per round */
> -#define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_LEN		512	/* Max. 2MB per discard */
>  #define DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME	50	/* 50 ms, if exists */
>  #define DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME	500	/* 500 ms, if device busy */
>  #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME	60000	/* 60 s, if no candidates */
> @@ -701,22 +700,22 @@ static inline void set_extent_info(struct extent_info *ei, unsigned int fofs,
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool __is_discard_mergeable(struct discard_info *back,
> -						struct discard_info *front)
> +			struct discard_info *front, unsigned int max_len)
>  {
>  	return (back->lstart + back->len == front->lstart) &&
> -		(back->len + front->len < DEF_MAX_DISCARD_LEN);
> +		(back->len + front->len <= max_len);
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool __is_discard_back_mergeable(struct discard_info *cur,
> -						struct discard_info *back)
> +			struct discard_info *back, unsigned int max_len)
>  {
> -	return __is_discard_mergeable(back, cur);
> +	return __is_discard_mergeable(back, cur, max_len);
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool __is_discard_front_mergeable(struct discard_info *cur,
> -						struct discard_info *front)
> +			struct discard_info *front, unsigned int max_len)
>  {
> -	return __is_discard_mergeable(cur, front);
> +	return __is_discard_mergeable(cur, front, max_len);
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool __is_extent_mergeable(struct extent_info *back,
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 4648561e2bfd..8e417a12684d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1086,6 +1086,9 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	struct discard_cmd *dc;
>  	struct discard_info di = {0};
>  	struct rb_node **insert_p = NULL, *insert_parent = NULL;
> +	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> +	unsigned int max_discard_blocks =
> +			SECTOR_TO_BLOCK(q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
>  	block_t end = lstart + len;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> @@ -1129,7 +1132,8 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  
>  		if (prev_dc && prev_dc->state == D_PREP &&
>  			prev_dc->bdev == bdev &&
> -			__is_discard_back_mergeable(&di, &prev_dc->di)) {
> +			__is_discard_back_mergeable(&di, &prev_dc->di,
> +							max_discard_blocks)) {
>  			prev_dc->di.len += di.len;
>  			dcc->undiscard_blks += di.len;
>  			__relocate_discard_cmd(dcc, prev_dc);
> @@ -1140,7 +1144,8 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  
>  		if (next_dc && next_dc->state == D_PREP &&
>  			next_dc->bdev == bdev &&
> -			__is_discard_front_mergeable(&di, &next_dc->di)) {
> +			__is_discard_front_mergeable(&di, &next_dc->di,
> +							max_discard_blocks)) {
>  			next_dc->di.lstart = di.lstart;
>  			next_dc->di.len += di.len;
>  			next_dc->di.start = di.start;
> @@ -1170,7 +1175,11 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  		struct block_device *bdev, block_t blkstart, block_t blklen)
>  {
> +	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> +	unsigned int max_discard_blocks =
> +			SECTOR_TO_BLOCK(q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
>  	block_t lblkstart = blkstart;
> +	block_t total_len = blklen;
>  
>  	trace_f2fs_queue_discard(bdev, blkstart, blklen);
>  
> @@ -1179,7 +1188,17 @@ static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  
>  		blkstart -= FDEV(devi).start_blk;
>  	}
> -	__update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lblkstart, blkstart, blklen);
> +
> +	while (total_len) {
> +		if (blklen > max_discard_blocks)
> +			blklen = max_discard_blocks;
> +		__update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lblkstart,
> +						blkstart, blklen);
> +		lblkstart += blklen;
> +		blkstart += blklen;
> +		total_len -= blklen;
> +		blklen = total_len;
> +	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.16.2.17.g38e79b1fd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ