lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180706224902.GD77984@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jul 2018 15:49:02 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chao@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: give another chance to issue discard with
 current granularity

On 07/05, Chao Yu wrote:
> If discard IOs are blocked by user IO, do not skip to select and issue
> discard with lower granularity, retry with current granularity.

We need to stop as soon as possible since user activity comes. Later, discard
thread will try it again in another idle time. What's your concern?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - fix deadloop.
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 1f9ae8270f86..6e2b2e717a40 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	struct discard_cmd *dc, *tmp;
>  	struct blk_plug plug;
>  	int i, iter = 0, issued = 0;
> -	bool io_interrupted = false;
> +	bool io_interrupted = false, end_up = false;
>  
>  	for (i = MAX_PLIST_NUM - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>  		if (i + 1 < dpolicy->granularity)
> @@ -1199,6 +1199,7 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  		pend_list = &dcc->pend_list[i];
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> +retry:
>  		if (list_empty(pend_list))
>  			goto next;
>  		if (unlikely(dcc->rbtree_check))
> @@ -1217,14 +1218,23 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  			__submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
>  			issued++;
>  skip:
> -			if (++iter >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> +			if (++iter >= dpolicy->max_requests) {
> +				end_up = true;
>  				break;
> +			}
>  		}
>  		blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * if discard IO was interrupted by user IOs, give another
> +		 * chance to issue discard with current granularity.
> +		 */
> +		if (io_interrupted && !end_up)
> +			goto retry;
>  next:
>  		mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
>  
> -		if (iter >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> +		if (end_up)
>  			break;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.18.0.rc1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ