linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: acer-wmi: mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180706231542.GB3041@fury>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jul 2018 16:15:42 -0700
From:   Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: acer-wmi: mark expected switch
 fall-throughs

On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 03:42:21PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Warning level 2 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
> index 8952173..114b028 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
> @@ -1018,6 +1018,7 @@ static acpi_status WMID_get_u32(u32 *value, u32 cap)
>  			*value = tmp & 0x1;
>  			return 0;
>  		}
> +		/* else: fall through */
>  	default:
>  		return AE_ERROR;
>  	}
> @@ -1344,6 +1345,7 @@ static acpi_status get_u32(u32 *value, u32 cap)
>  			status = AMW0_get_u32(value, cap);
>  			break;
>  		}
> +		/* else: fall through */
>  	case ACER_WMID:
>  		status = WMID_get_u32(value, cap);
>  		break;
> @@ -1386,6 +1388,7 @@ static acpi_status set_u32(u32 value, u32 cap)
>  
>  				return AMW0_set_u32(value, cap);
>  			}
> +			/* else: fall through */

I suspect you are correct, bu these last two weren't obviously intentional to
me. Has this seen any testing?

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center