[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180706054713.263969548@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 07:46:48 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 24/61] netfilter: nft_compat: prepare for indirect info storage
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
commit 8bdf164744b2c7f63561846c01cff3db597f282d upstream.
Next patch will make it possible for *info to be stored in
a separate allocation instead of the expr private area.
This removes the 'expr priv area is info blob' assumption
from the match init/destroy/eval functions.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/nft_compat.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
@@ -324,11 +324,11 @@ static int nft_target_validate(const str
return 0;
}
-static void nft_match_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
- struct nft_regs *regs,
- const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt)
+static void __nft_match_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
+ struct nft_regs *regs,
+ const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt,
+ void *info)
{
- void *info = nft_expr_priv(expr);
struct xt_match *match = expr->ops->data;
struct sk_buff *skb = pkt->skb;
bool ret;
@@ -352,6 +352,13 @@ static void nft_match_eval(const struct
}
}
+static void nft_match_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
+ struct nft_regs *regs,
+ const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt)
+{
+ __nft_match_eval(expr, regs, pkt, nft_expr_priv(expr));
+}
+
static const struct nla_policy nft_match_policy[NFTA_MATCH_MAX + 1] = {
[NFTA_MATCH_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING },
[NFTA_MATCH_REV] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
@@ -412,10 +419,10 @@ static void match_compat_from_user(struc
}
static int
-nft_match_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr,
- const struct nlattr * const tb[])
+__nft_match_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr,
+ const struct nlattr * const tb[],
+ void *info)
{
- void *info = nft_expr_priv(expr);
struct xt_match *match = expr->ops->data;
struct xt_mtchk_param par;
size_t size = XT_ALIGN(nla_len(tb[NFTA_MATCH_INFO]));
@@ -444,11 +451,18 @@ nft_match_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx
return 0;
}
+static int
+nft_match_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr,
+ const struct nlattr * const tb[])
+{
+ return __nft_match_init(ctx, expr, tb, nft_expr_priv(expr));
+}
+
static void
-nft_match_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr)
+__nft_match_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr,
+ void *info)
{
struct xt_match *match = expr->ops->data;
- void *info = nft_expr_priv(expr);
struct xt_mtdtor_param par;
par.net = ctx->net;
@@ -462,9 +476,15 @@ nft_match_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *
module_put(match->me);
}
-static int nft_match_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nft_expr *expr)
+static void
+nft_match_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr)
+{
+ __nft_match_destroy(ctx, expr, nft_expr_priv(expr));
+}
+
+static int __nft_match_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nft_expr *expr,
+ void *info)
{
- void *info = nft_expr_priv(expr);
struct xt_match *match = expr->ops->data;
if (nla_put_string(skb, NFTA_MATCH_NAME, match->name) ||
@@ -478,6 +498,11 @@ nla_put_failure:
return -1;
}
+static int nft_match_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nft_expr *expr)
+{
+ return __nft_match_dump(skb, expr, nft_expr_priv(expr));
+}
+
static int nft_match_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
const struct nft_expr *expr,
const struct nft_data **data)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists