linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/numa_emulation: Fix uniform size build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:03:10 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/numa_emulation: Fix uniform size build failure


* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:

> > config attached.

Doh, I intended to attach the config - attached now.

> > These numa_emulation changes are a bit of a trainwreck - I'm removing both
> > num_emulation commits from -tip for now, could you please resubmit a fixed/tested
> > combo version?
> 
> So I squashed the fix and let the 0day robot chew on it all day with no reports 
> as of yet. I just recompiled it here and am not seeing the link failure, can you 
> send me the details of the kernel config + gcc version that is failing?

My guess: it's some weird Kconfig combination in this 32-bit config.

Can you reproduce it with this config?

Thanks,

	Ingo

View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (104904 bytes)