[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807061240560.1664@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:42:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular dependency in IPI
enlightenment.
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > >
> > > The problem is that the wreckage is in Linus tree and needs to be fixed
> > > there, i.e. via x86/urgent.
> > >
> > > Now we have the new bits queued in x86/hyperv already which collide. So
> > > we
> > > need to merge x86/urgent into x86/hyperv after applying the fix and mop up
> > > the merge wreckage in x86/hyperv.
> > >
> > > I'll have a look tomorrow morning unless you beat me to it.
> >
> > I can rebase this patch against the latest tip and resend (tomorrow).
>
> That doesn't help as we need to push the original fix to Linus ...
Applied it to x86/urgent and fixed up the '-1' sloppy hack as pointed out
by Vitaly and merged x86/urgent into x86/hyperv.
Please check both branches for correctness.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists