[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180706131243.GV2458@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 15:12:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mingo@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, chris.redpath@....com,
patrick.bellasi@....com, valentin.schneider@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...aro.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tkjos@...gle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
smuckle@...gle.com, adharmap@...cinc.com, skannan@...cinc.com,
pkondeti@...eaurora.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
edubezval@...il.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
currojerez@...eup.net, javi.merino@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/12] sched/fair: Introduce an energy estimation
helper function
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:40:40PM +0100, Quentin Perret wrote:
> +static long
compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct freq_domain *fd)
> +{
> + long util, max_util, sum_util, energy = 0;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + while (fd) {
> + max_util = sum_util = 0;
> + for_each_cpu_and(cpu, freq_domain_span(fd), cpu_online_mask) {
I had a wee little wtf moment when I realized this crosses root_domain
boundaries but that that is actually desired. A comment might be in
order.
> + util = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, dst_cpu);
> + util += cpu_util_dl(cpu_rq(cpu));
> + /* XXX: add RT util_avg when available. */
> +
> + max_util = max(util, max_util);
> + sum_util += util;
Did you want to use sugov_get_util() here? There is no way we're going
to duplicate all that.
ISTR we already established the whole EAS was going to require using
schedutil anyway.
> + }
> +
> + energy += em_fd_energy(fd->obj, max_util, sum_util);
> + fd = fd->next;
> + }
> +
> + return energy;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists