[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d76c395-399a-bb9a-4e22-c3cff81ab6a8@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 03:39:39 +0000
From: Hamish Martin <Hamish.Martin@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: "xiubli@...hat.com" <xiubli@...hat.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"pkalever@...hat.com" <pkalever@...hat.com>,
"pkarampu@...hat.com" <pkarampu@...hat.com>,
"atumball@...hat.com" <atumball@...hat.com>,
"sabose@...hat.com" <sabose@...hat.com>,
"mchristi@...hat.com" <mchristi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] uio: change to use the mutex lock instead of the
spin lock
Looks ok to me.
Reviewed-by: Hamish Martin <hamish.martin@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
On 07/06/2018 02:57 PM, xiubli@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
>
> We are hitting a regression with the following commit:
>
> commit a93e7b331568227500186a465fee3c2cb5dffd1f
> Author: Hamish Martin <hamish.martin@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> Date: Mon May 14 13:32:23 2018 +1200
>
> uio: Prevent device destruction while fds are open
>
> The problem is the addition of spin_lock_irqsave in uio_write. This
> leads to hitting uio_write -> copy_from_user -> _copy_from_user ->
> might_fault and the logs filling up with sleeping warnings.
>
> I also noticed some uio drivers allocate memory, sleep, grab mutexes
> from callouts like open() and release and uio is now doing
> spin_lock_irqsave while calling them.
>
> Reported-by: Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>
> CC: Hamish Martin <hamish.martin@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/uio/uio.c | 32 +++++++++++++-------------------
> include/linux/uio_driver.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio.c b/drivers/uio/uio.c
> index b4b2ae1..655ade4 100644
> --- a/drivers/uio/uio.c
> +++ b/drivers/uio/uio.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,6 @@ static int uio_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> struct uio_device *idev;
> struct uio_listener *listener;
> int ret = 0;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> mutex_lock(&minor_lock);
> idev = idr_find(&uio_idr, iminor(inode));
> @@ -460,10 +459,10 @@ static int uio_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> listener->event_count = atomic_read(&idev->event);
> filep->private_data = listener;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_lock(&idev->info_lock);
> if (idev->info && idev->info->open)
> ret = idev->info->open(idev->info, inode);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_unlock(&idev->info_lock);
> if (ret)
> goto err_infoopen;
>
> @@ -495,12 +494,11 @@ static int uio_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> int ret = 0;
> struct uio_listener *listener = filep->private_data;
> struct uio_device *idev = listener->dev;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_lock(&idev->info_lock);
> if (idev->info && idev->info->release)
> ret = idev->info->release(idev->info, inode);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_unlock(&idev->info_lock);
>
> module_put(idev->owner);
> kfree(listener);
> @@ -513,12 +511,11 @@ static __poll_t uio_poll(struct file *filep, poll_table *wait)
> struct uio_listener *listener = filep->private_data;
> struct uio_device *idev = listener->dev;
> __poll_t ret = 0;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_lock(&idev->info_lock);
> if (!idev->info || !idev->info->irq)
> ret = -EIO;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_unlock(&idev->info_lock);
>
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -537,12 +534,11 @@ static ssize_t uio_read(struct file *filep, char __user *buf,
> DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> ssize_t retval = 0;
> s32 event_count;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_lock(&idev->info_lock);
> if (!idev->info || !idev->info->irq)
> retval = -EIO;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_unlock(&idev->info_lock);
>
> if (retval)
> return retval;
> @@ -592,9 +588,8 @@ static ssize_t uio_write(struct file *filep, const char __user *buf,
> struct uio_device *idev = listener->dev;
> ssize_t retval;
> s32 irq_on;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_lock(&idev->info_lock);
> if (!idev->info || !idev->info->irq) {
> retval = -EIO;
> goto out;
> @@ -618,7 +613,7 @@ static ssize_t uio_write(struct file *filep, const char __user *buf,
> retval = idev->info->irqcontrol(idev->info, irq_on);
>
> out:
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_unlock(&idev->info_lock);
> return retval ? retval : sizeof(s32);
> }
>
> @@ -865,7 +860,7 @@ int __uio_register_device(struct module *owner,
>
> idev->owner = owner;
> idev->info = info;
> - spin_lock_init(&idev->info_lock);
> + mutex_init(&idev->info_lock);
> init_waitqueue_head(&idev->wait);
> atomic_set(&idev->event, 0);
>
> @@ -929,7 +924,6 @@ int __uio_register_device(struct module *owner,
> void uio_unregister_device(struct uio_info *info)
> {
> struct uio_device *idev;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> if (!info || !info->uio_dev)
> return;
> @@ -943,9 +937,9 @@ void uio_unregister_device(struct uio_info *info)
> if (info->irq && info->irq != UIO_IRQ_CUSTOM)
> free_irq(info->irq, idev);
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_lock(&idev->info_lock);
> idev->info = NULL;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idev->info_lock, flags);
> + mutex_unlock(&idev->info_lock);
>
> device_unregister(&idev->dev);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/uio_driver.h b/include/linux/uio_driver.h
> index 6c5f207..6f8b68c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uio_driver.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uio_driver.h
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct uio_device {
> struct fasync_struct *async_queue;
> wait_queue_head_t wait;
> struct uio_info *info;
> - spinlock_t info_lock;
> + struct mutex info_lock;
> struct kobject *map_dir;
> struct kobject *portio_dir;
> };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists