[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180706144321.GE3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 07:43:21 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched/locking/doc: Miscellaneous fixes
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:28:12AM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > What is the plan for this series?
> >
> > We are currently discussing locking changes that might affect 2/3, but
> > I'd still consider this patch and the overall series as an improvement
> > over the current status (1/3 is a fix to the code) and I'd really like
> > future changes to be based on this series...
> >
> > I expected this series to go via "-rcu -> tip -> ..."; 2/3 had Peter's
> > Ack, but 1/3 and 3/3 are missing any comments (or tags): please let me
> > know if any action on the series is required from me (the series still
> > applies on the latest "dev" branch of -rcu).
>
> You can add my ack:
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> to the others as well, they look like a definite improvement. I'm fine
> with these going through Paul's tree, Ingo?
I have pulled them in and will submit them to the upcoming merge window,
thank you all! If someone else would prefer to take them, just let
me know.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists