[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180706153028.GA6838@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:30:28 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] device: Add #define dev_fmt similar to #define pr_fmt
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 08:15:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Add a prefixing macro to dev_<level> uses similar to the pr_fmt
> prefixing macro used in pr_<level> calls.
>
> This can help avoid some string duplication in dev_<level> uses.
>
> The default, like pr_fmt, is an empty #define dev_fmt(fmt) fmt
>
> Rename the existing dev_<level> functions to _dev_<level> and
> introduce #define dev_<level> _dev_<level> macros that use the
> new #define dev_fmt
>
> Miscellanea:
>
> o Consistently use #defines with fmt, ... and ##__VA_ARGS__
> o Remove unnecessary externs
SHouldn't these be separate patches please?
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/core.c | 12 +++---
> include/linux/device.h | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
Ok this seems like a lot of churn for no real apparent gain. What is
all of this getting us? What is the benifit, you have more code now,
why is that good?
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists