[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7773add-7cac-f57f-af27-bd871bb7a0d7@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 19:43:15 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] x86/kvmclock: Move kvmclock vsyscall param and init
to kvmclock
On 06/07/2018 18:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -241,6 +269,9 @@ void __init kvmclock_init(void)
> return;
> }
>
> + if (!hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_KVM))
> + kvmclock_vsyscall = 0;
> +
No need for this; by the time you get here, the condition will always be
true. And if you don't have kvmclock, hv_clock will be NULL and
initialization will be skipped anyway in kvm_setup_vsyscall_timeinfo.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists