[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807062123080.1592@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 21:23:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] x86/kvmclock: Move kvmclock vsyscall param and init
to kvmclock
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/07/2018 18:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > @@ -241,6 +269,9 @@ void __init kvmclock_init(void)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_KVM))
> > + kvmclock_vsyscall = 0;
> > +
>
> No need for this; by the time you get here, the condition will always be
> true. And if you don't have kvmclock, hv_clock will be NULL and
> initialization will be skipped anyway in kvm_setup_vsyscall_timeinfo.
Right, stupid me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists