lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAES_P+_GTRcFya=N20+b+U=HOpv9gcpYkfJW_gU_i_2pH2hmMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jul 2018 14:34:53 -0700
From:   noman pouigt <variksla@...il.com>
To:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
        kyungmin.park@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: devfreq relation with pm qos

+ dev freq maintainters.

On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:37 AM, noman pouigt <variksla@...il.com> wrote:
> folks,
>
> I am trying to figure out the relationship between PM QOS
> with devfreq framework. I see this thread[1] where MyungJoo
> talks about QOS and devfreq but that control is through
> sysfs but I don't see any relation of pm qos (kernel/power/qos.c)
> with devfreq directly as devfreq is not calling any of the QOS
> api's. Is this intended?
>
> Isn't QOS value update using pm_qos_update_request has a
> direct relation with devfreq drivers i.e. setting the value to
> high or low selects the corresponding voltage and frequency
> setting in devfreq framework? I went through the devfreq
> drivers and couldn't find that relationship. Is this by design or
> I am missing something very obvious?
>
> [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/484161/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ