[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae639d60-9fc9-04fe-debd-ac1c3be86d16@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 12:10:30 +0530
From: "Agrawal, Akshu" <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
"Mukunda,Vijendar" <vijendar.mukunda@....com>
Cc: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
jclinton@...omium.org, dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/acp: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in mfd_add_device
in acp_hw_init
>>>> Was this patch ever picked up? I can't find it in agd5f/linux.
>>>
>>>
>>> It wasn't applied. I don't see 51f7415039d4 ("drm/amd/amdgpu:
>>> creating two I2S instances for stoney/cz") upstream yet either.
>>> Daniel, Vijendar, which ones do you want applied? Can you send me the
>>> patches?
>>>
>>> Alex
>>
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> "drm/amd/amdgpu: creating two I2S instances for stoney/cz" patch exists in
>> drm-next branch. Please pick the patch .
>
> So just that one? I seem to recall there being later revisions of
> that patch that you reworked after applying the original version.
> Also that patch was originally part of a larger series. Are those
> changes required too?
>
> Alex
>
Hi Alex,
In agd5f/linux, branch "amd-staging-drm-next",
506f7d1 drm/amd/amdgpu: creating two I2S instances for stoney/cz
patch is present.
This patch is the correct version and there aren't any other changes
required with it.
Only Dan's, this mail's patch is currently missing form the tree.
Thanks,
Akshu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists