linux-kernel - [PATCH V3 2/7] mmc: sdhci: made changes for System Address register of SDMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1531106398-14062-3-git-send-email-zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon,  9 Jul 2018 11:19:53 +0800
From:   Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
        Billows Wu <billows.wu@...eadtrum.com>, zhang.lyra@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/7] mmc: sdhci: made changes for System Address register of SDMA

According to the SD host controller specification version 4.10, when
Host Version 4 is enabled, SDMA uses ADMA System Address register
(05Fh-058h) instead of using SDMA System Address register to
support both 32-bit and 64-bit addressing.

Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 525862f..c7de6a5 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static void sdhci_adma_table_post(struct sdhci_host *host,
 	}
 }
 
-static u32 sdhci_sdma_address(struct sdhci_host *host)
+static dma_addr_t sdhci_sdma_address(struct sdhci_host *host)
 {
 	if (host->bounce_buffer)
 		return host->bounce_addr;
@@ -709,6 +709,18 @@ static u32 sdhci_sdma_address(struct sdhci_host *host)
 		return sg_dma_address(host->data->sg);
 }
 
+static void sdhci_set_sdma_addr(struct sdhci_host *host, dma_addr_t addr)
+{
+	if (host->v4_mode) {
+		sdhci_writel(host, addr, SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS);
+		if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA)
+			sdhci_writel(host, (u64)addr >> 32, SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS_HI);
+	} else {
+		sdhci_writel(host, addr, SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
+	}
+
+}
+
 static unsigned int sdhci_target_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host,
 					 struct mmc_command *cmd,
 					 struct mmc_data *data)
@@ -968,8 +980,7 @@ static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
 					     SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS_HI);
 		} else {
 			WARN_ON(sg_cnt != 1);
-			sdhci_writel(host, sdhci_sdma_address(host),
-				     SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
+			sdhci_set_sdma_addr(host, sdhci_sdma_address(host));
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -2796,7 +2807,7 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
 		 * some controllers are faulty, don't trust them.
 		 */
 		if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DMA_END) {
-			u32 dmastart, dmanow;
+			dma_addr_t dmastart, dmanow;
 
 			dmastart = sdhci_sdma_address(host);
 			dmanow = dmastart + host->data->bytes_xfered;
@@ -2807,9 +2818,9 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
 				~(SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE - 1)) +
 				SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE;
 			host->data->bytes_xfered = dmanow - dmastart;
-			DBG("DMA base 0x%08x, transferred 0x%06x bytes, next 0x%08x\n",
-			    dmastart, host->data->bytes_xfered, dmanow);
-			sdhci_writel(host, dmanow, SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
+			DBG("DMA base 0x%016llx, transferred 0x%06x bytes, next 0x%016llx\n",
+			    (u64)dmastart, host->data->bytes_xfered, (u64)dmanow);
+			sdhci_set_sdma_addr(host, dmanow);
 		}
 
 		if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_END) {
-- 
2.7.4