[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYs6RCw3Z9jqaPf3H_OExY+AtDFb21rNJXr6Gr2oVUTWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 15:21:10 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, evgreen@...omium.org,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mmc: core: cd_label must be last entry of mmc_gpio struct
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 7:35 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 3 July 2018 at 04:25, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com> wrote:
> >
> >> I think either way is OK, since flexible array is used in kernel code quite commonly,
> >> so I prefer to make code change as small as possible, the original patch can also prevent
> >> similar bug in future. And like below commit Fabio pointed out, it also has same kind
> >> of fix: a158531f3c92 ("gpio: 74x164: Fix crash during .remove()"). Thanks.
> >
> > I am also fine with this patch or the one from Linus.
> >
> > Maybe Anson's patch could be applied to 4.18-rc as a bug fix and
> > Linus' patch could be applied to 4.19-rc1 as a cleanup/improvement?
>
> Good idea!
>
> I have queued up Anson's v2 patch as a fix for 4.18.
>
> Linus, can please re-post a re-based version of your change on top!? I
> guess you can add Anson's and Fabio's reviewed by tags for it as well.
Sure thing! I'll fold in Andy's suggested fix as well.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists