linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: add support for drive strength

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYyeFTsPe+pR26DCO5uOkLZu-+Nz8vDdEg47NWn4f-4Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jul 2018 15:40:26 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: add support for drive strength

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:19 AM Ludovic Desroches
<ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com> wrote:

> Add support for the drive strength configuration. Usually, this value is
> expressed in mA. Since the numeric value depends on VDDIOP voltage, a
> value we can't retrieve at runtime, the controller uses low, medium and
> high to define the drive strength.
>
> The PIO controller accepts two values for the low drive configuration: 0
> and 1. Most of the time, we don't care about the drive strength. So we
> keep the default value which is 0. The drive strength is advertised
> through the sysfs only when it has been explicitly set in the device
> tree i.e. if its value is different from 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
> ---
>
> Changes:
> - v2: use atmel,drive-strength property instead of drive-strengh one
> since it is not expressend in mA and there is no way to retrieve this
> value at runtime.

Patch applied with Rob's ACK!

Yours,
Linus Walleij