linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/17] dt-bindings: display: sun4i-drm: Add R40 TV TCON description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+2Cv+cS+c8DuHackVfO3beYHx-p-dXpK2z=vQwHKSD-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jul 2018 08:16:45 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] dt-bindings: display: sun4i-drm: Add R40 TV TCON description

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 2:46 PM Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net> wrote:
>
> Dne petek, 06. julij 2018 ob 22:40:52 CEST je Rob Herring napisal(a):
> > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 07:51:02PM +0200, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> > > TCON description is expanded with R40 TV TCON compatible. It is a bit
> > > special, because it is connected to TCON TOP instead directly to mixer
> > > and it needs special handling.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sunxi/sun4i-drm.txt | 3 ++-
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Please add acks/reviews when posting new versions.
>
> This is not exactly the same version you give ack for, so I didn't include it.

Then you need to state what changed (in this patch) and why you didn't
add the ack.

> I'm not sure where the line for that is.
>
> In contrast to previous version, it doesn't introduce additional clock.

Sounds trivial enough to keep the ack.

Rob