[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180709144925.GU2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:49:25 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David.Laight@...LAB.COM" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] devres: Explicitly align datai[] to 64-bit
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:33:26PM +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > In fact, since alloc_dr() uses kmalloc() to allocate the entire thing,
> > it is impossible to guarantee a larger alignment than kmalloc does.
>
> Well but 4-bytes [which is critical for atomic64_t] should be much less
> than a sane cache line length so above should work.
AFAICT ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN ends up being 4 on x86_32 (it doesn't
define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN and doesn't seem to otherwise override the
thing).
So unconditionally setting the alignment of devres::data to 8 seems
broken.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists