[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180709154521.GS2512@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 17:45:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David.Laight@...LAB.COM" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] devres: Explicitly align datai[] to 64-bit
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:34:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:29:58PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Shouldn't that be 8? AFAICT, __alignof__(unsigned long long) is 8 on
> > x86_32:
>
> Curious, I wonder why we put that align in atomic64_32 then.
Shiny, look at this: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54188
Powered by blists - more mailing lists