[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180709162920.2b94916f@bahia.lan>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:29:20 +0200
From: Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>
To: piaojun <piaojun@...wei.com>
Cc: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<ericvh@...il.com>, <rminnich@...dia.gov>, <lucho@...kov.net>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] net/9p/client.c: put refcount of
trans_mod in error case in parse_opts()
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:42:56 +0800
piaojun <piaojun@...wei.com> wrote:
> From my test, the second mount will fail after umounting successfully.
> The reason is that we put refcount of trans_mod in the correct case rather
> than the error case in parse_opts() at last. That will cause the refcount
> decrease to -1, and when we try to get trans_mod again in
> try_module_get(), we could only increase refcount to 0 which will cause
> failure as follows:
> parse_opts
> v9fs_get_trans_by_name
> try_module_get : return NULL to caller which cause error
>
> So we should put refcount of trans_mod in error case.
>
> Fixes: 9421c3e64137ec ("net/9p/client.c: fix potential refcnt problem of trans module")
>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@...wei.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>
> net/9p/client.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
> index 18c5271..5c13431 100644
> --- a/net/9p/client.c
> +++ b/net/9p/client.c
> @@ -225,7 +225,8 @@ static int parse_opts(char *opts, struct p9_client *clnt)
> }
>
> free_and_return:
> - v9fs_put_trans(clnt->trans_mod);
> + if (ret)
> + v9fs_put_trans(clnt->trans_mod);
> kfree(tmp_options);
> return ret;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists