[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180709155618.GH30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:56:19 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH vfs/for-next 00/18] fs_context fixes
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:31:59PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> -int __mnt_is_readonly(struct vfsmount *mnt)
> +bool __mnt_is_readonly(struct vfsmount *mnt)
> {
> if (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_READONLY)
> - return 1;
> + return true;
> if (sb_rdonly(mnt->mnt_sb))
> - return 1;
> - return 0;
> + return true;
> + return false;
Egads... *If* you go for bool here, why not
return (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_READONLY) || sb_rdonly(mnt->mnt_sb);
and be done with that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists