lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180709163939.GX32415@magnolia>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jul 2018 09:39:39 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_bmap_util: use swap macro

On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 09:05:39AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Make use of the swap macro and remove some unnecessary variables.
> This makes the code easier to read and maintain. Also, reduces the
> stack usage.
> 
> This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 13 ++-----------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> index 83b1e8c..4b0b16f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> @@ -1691,7 +1691,6 @@ xfs_swap_extent_forks(
>  	int			*src_log_flags,
>  	int			*target_log_flags)
>  {
> -	struct xfs_ifork	tempifp, *ifp, *tifp;
>  	xfs_filblks_t		aforkblks = 0;
>  	xfs_filblks_t		taforkblks = 0;
>  	xfs_extnum_t		junk;
> @@ -1733,11 +1732,7 @@ xfs_swap_extent_forks(
>  	/*
>  	 * Swap the data forks of the inodes
>  	 */
> -	ifp = &ip->i_df;
> -	tifp = &tip->i_df;
> -	tempifp = *ifp;		/* struct copy */
> -	*ifp = *tifp;		/* struct copy */
> -	*tifp = tempifp;	/* struct copy */
> +	swap(ip->i_df, tip->i_df);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Fix the on-disk inode values

Why not use swap() on the di_nextents and di_format exchange below here
too?

> @@ -1987,14 +1982,10 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
>  
>  	/* Swap the cow forks. */
>  	if (xfs_sb_version_hasreflink(&mp->m_sb)) {
> -		xfs_extnum_t	extnum;
> -
>  		ASSERT(ip->i_cformat == XFS_DINODE_FMT_EXTENTS);
>  		ASSERT(tip->i_cformat == XFS_DINODE_FMT_EXTENTS);
>  
> -		extnum = ip->i_cnextents;
> -		ip->i_cnextents = tip->i_cnextents;
> -		tip->i_cnextents = extnum;
> +		swap(ip->i_cnextents, tip->i_cnextents);
>  
>  		cowfp = ip->i_cowfp;
>  		ip->i_cowfp = tip->i_cowfp;

Same here -- why not use swap on {ip,tip}->i_cowfp?

--D

> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ