[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b1b0023dd5686242be6b08fcf897c9f25a64f83.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 21:30:04 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>, Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Yisheng Xie <ysxie@...mail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Add for_each_if()
On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 18:25 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> v2: Explain a bit better what this is good for, after the discussion
> with Peter Z.
Since I have not been Cc'ed to your discussion there is another
weirdness which this macro prohibits, i.e.
for_each_blah() {
} else {
...blahblah...
}
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists