linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/12 V2] ipc: cleanups & bugfixes, rhashtable update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <be986d6d-4388-5d4e-e1cb-5ae28212d120@colorfullife.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:44:33 +0200
From:   Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 1vier1@....de,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12 V2] ipc: cleanups & bugfixes, rhashtable update

Hi Davidlohr,

On 07/09/2018 10:09 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>
>> @Davidlohr:
>> Please double check that I have taken the correct patches, and
>> that I didn't break anything.
>
> Everything seems ok.
>
> Patch 8 had an alternative patch that didn't change nowarn semantics for
> the rhashtable resizing operations (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/22/732),
> but nobody complained about the one you picked up (and also has 
> Michal's ack).
>
Which patch do you prefer?
I have seen two versions, and if I have picked up the wrong one, then I 
can change it.

--
     Manfred