linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Require author Signed-off-by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVZae7Nb-Nr=f1uJD9ASxaio0Ob-5__FHzN=gEp9MSc+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:50:14 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, jgg@...lanox.com,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Require author Signed-off-by

Hi Pavel,

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:47 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > Print an error if none of the Signed-off-by lines cover the patch
> > author.
>
> Is it good idea? Signed-off-by system was _not_ meant to prevent
> submission of third party patches.

My main motivation is catching accidentally forgotten Sobs.
It's still up to you to submit or accept a patch that triggers
checkpatch errors.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds