linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 4.18-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFwg-2GP4ASTdd1pusmZkF7c8AN9febVDCaioDxzYJSLfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jul 2018 17:41:34 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 4.18-rc3

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 10:22 PM James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com> wrote:
>
> We did discuss removing the r/w interface, but, as you say, it's been
> around for ages so it's not clear what regressions would surface if we
> did.

So since nobody else followed up on this, the attached patch is what I
was thinking of just committing.

It removes the warnings from the access check, and just puts them
(unconditionally) at the top of the read/write function instead.

Hmm?

                 Linus

View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (1955 bytes)