[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1531213084-27417-4-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:58:00 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
will.deacon@....com, julien.thierry@....com, robin.murphy@....com,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/7] arm_pmu: Add support for 64bit event counters
Each PMU has a set of 32bit event counters. But in some
special cases, the events could be counted using counters
which are effectively 64bit wide.
e.g, Arm V8 PMUv3 has a 64 bit cycle counter which can count
only the CPU cycles. Also, the PMU can chain the event counters
to effectively count as a 64bit counter.
Add support for tracking the events that uses 64bit counters.
This only affects the periods set for each counter in the core
driver.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
---
Changes since v3:
- Replace ternary operator with if..else for max_period
- Added Acked-by from Mark R
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 16 ++++++++++------
include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 6ddc00d..8cad6b5 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -28,9 +28,12 @@
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct arm_pmu *, cpu_armpmu);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_irq);
-static inline u64 arm_pmu_max_period(void)
+static inline u64 arm_pmu_event_max_period(struct perf_event *event)
{
- return (1ULL << 32) - 1;
+ if (event->hw.flags & ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT)
+ return GENMASK_ULL(63, 0);
+ else
+ return GENMASK_ULL(31, 0);
}
static int
@@ -122,7 +125,7 @@ int armpmu_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
u64 max_period;
int ret = 0;
- max_period = arm_pmu_max_period();
+ max_period = arm_pmu_event_max_period(event);
if (unlikely(left <= -period)) {
left = period;
local64_set(&hwc->period_left, left);
@@ -148,7 +151,7 @@ int armpmu_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, (u64)-left);
- armpmu->write_counter(event, (u64)(-left) & 0xffffffff);
+ armpmu->write_counter(event, (u64)(-left) & max_period);
perf_event_update_userpage(event);
@@ -160,7 +163,7 @@ u64 armpmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
u64 delta, prev_raw_count, new_raw_count;
- u64 max_period = arm_pmu_max_period();
+ u64 max_period = arm_pmu_event_max_period(event);
again:
prev_raw_count = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
@@ -368,6 +371,7 @@ __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
int mapping;
+ hwc->flags = 0;
mapping = armpmu->map_event(event);
if (mapping < 0) {
@@ -410,7 +414,7 @@ __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
* is far less likely to overtake the previous one unless
* you have some serious IRQ latency issues.
*/
- hwc->sample_period = arm_pmu_max_period() >> 1;
+ hwc->sample_period = arm_pmu_event_max_period(event) >> 1;
hwc->last_period = hwc->sample_period;
local64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index f7126a2..10f92e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -25,6 +25,12 @@
*/
#define ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS 32
+/*
+ * ARM PMU hw_event flags
+ */
+/* Event uses a 64bit counter */
+#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT 1
+
#define HW_OP_UNSUPPORTED 0xFFFF
#define C(_x) PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_##_x
#define CACHE_OP_UNSUPPORTED 0xFFFF
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists