lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 17:45:34 +0800 From: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com> To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> CC: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: kconfig usage in automatic kernel test On 07/08/2018 10:15 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2018-07-06 17:49 GMT+09:00 Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>: >> Masahiro-san, >> >> I am writing some utility for internal kdump test with latest kernel, >> my purpose is to test the new introduced kernel feature. For automatical >> test, I see several config target could help, like olddefconfig, all*config. >> >> But for my purpose, I don't find a good way. For example, olddefconfig >> will let the now config item has default value, while some feature may >> default to "N"; allyesconfig will slow the compilation notably. >> But "all*config" has KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG help to customizing some config >> item, that is a good utility, but seems it can't be used in olddefconfig. >> >> All these things let me have 2 questions: >> >> 1. What would you suggest for my purpose? > > > scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh > can be used with any *config target. > I took a quick glance at the script, it seems a good method to me. Thanks very much, Masahiro-san. > If you want to tweak some symbols based on olddefconfig, > this could be the one you want. > > >> 2. allyesconfig, allmodconfig, randconfig seems useful for test kbuild, >> but what's the purpose of allnoconfig, alldefconfig? In others words, >> when people would need allnoconfig, alldefconfig? > > I sometimes use allnoconfig for build testing. > > When I want to test the whole build process quickly, > I disable as many drivers as possible to save time. > > > I do not use alldefconfig. > Anyway, it would not hurt to have it for completeness. > Thanks for clarifying. -- Sincerely, Cao jin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists