[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180710052835.581cdf28@lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 05:28:35 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] docs, debugfs: start explicit debugfs documentation
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 08:45:06 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> For the "this is what a specific debugfs file contains", those should go
> into Documenation/ABI/ if you really want to document those types of
> things.
Do we really want to start populating Documentation/ABI with stuff that's
explicitly *not* ABI? Keeping it separate might make more sense, IMO.
I'd put extfrag_index with the MM docs, for example.
> But as it is, this single patch does too many different things all at
> once.
...and yet not enough :) This stuff is almost in RST already, it would
be nice to go all the way and integrate it into the rest of our docs.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists