[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180710121433.in7tzjahptem6vnq@salvia>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:14:33 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Máté Eckl <ecklm94@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: NFT_SOCKET don't use NF_SOCKET_IPV6 without
NF_TABLES_IPV6
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:45:17PM +0200, Máté Eckl wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:24:59PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:15:36PM +0200, Máté Eckl wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:56:05PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > [...]
> > > This patch only solves the nf_socket and nft_socket modules problem so I can
> > > only submit a v2 for 'netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6 select dependencies' but
> > > you already applied it so it would meen a force push. Should I do this?
> > >
> > > I think Arnd's patch solves these problems in case we don't want to force-push
> > > or rebase.
> >
> > You are refering to these two patches, right?
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/941374/
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/941696/
>
> Oh, I missed the first one. So basically I should just squash them and resubmit
> right? Or even replace ("netfilter: Kconfig: Change IPv6 select
> dependencies") with these changes?
That's one possibility, yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists