linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180710102050.78ae0ea8@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:20:50 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Glexiner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and
 unify their usage

On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:21:47 -0700
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:

> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..dc01c7f4d326
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@

Can you send a patch on top of this, that adds a SPDX header here. Just
add another patch, no need to resend this one.

I need to go through all the files in kernel/trace/* and add SPDX
headers. I don't want to add more files that don't have them.

I'm still playing around with this patch, and testing it.

-- Steve

> +/*
> + * preemptoff and irqoff tracepoints
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include <trace/events/preemptirq.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
> +/* Per-cpu variable to prevent redundant calls when IRQs already off */
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, tracing_irq_cpu);
> +
> +void trace_hardirqs_on(void)
> +{
> +	if (lockdep_recursing(current) || !this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu))
> +		return;
> +
> +	trace_irq_enable_rcuidle(CALLER_ADDR0, CALLER_ADDR1);
> +	this_cpu_write(tracing_irq_cpu, 0);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on);
> +
> +void trace_hardirqs_off(void)
> +{
> +	if (lockdep_recursing(current) || this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu))
> +		return;
> +
> +	this_cpu_write(tracing_irq_cpu, 1);
> +	trace_irq_disable_rcuidle(CALLER_ADDR0, CALLER_ADDR1);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_off);
> +
> +__visible void trace_hardirqs_on_caller(unsigned long caller_addr)
> +{
> +	if (lockdep_recursing(current) || !this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu))
> +		return;
> +
> +	trace_irq_enable_rcuidle(CALLER_ADDR0, caller_addr);
> +	this_cpu_write(tracing_irq_cpu, 0);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on_caller);
> +
> +__visible void trace_hardirqs_off_caller(unsigned long caller_addr)
> +{
> +	if (lockdep_recursing(current) || this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu))
> +		return;
> +
> +	this_cpu_write(tracing_irq_cpu, 1);
> +	trace_irq_disable_rcuidle(CALLER_ADDR0, caller_addr);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_off_caller);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_PREEMPT_TOGGLE
> +
> +void trace_preempt_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1)
> +{
> +	trace_preempt_enable_rcuidle(a0, a1);
> +}
> +
> +void trace_preempt_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1)
> +{
> +	trace_preempt_disable_rcuidle(a0, a1);
> +}
> +#endif