[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de66301c-8c03-6dba-1ab9-c9a9f556c66a@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:08:48 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Remove useless hrtimer_active check
On 19/06/2018 16:02, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The function tick_clear() checks if the timer is active and in this case
> cancels the timer. However, hrtimer_cancel does the same check.
>
> Perhaps, this test is made on purpose to skip some function calls for
> efficiency reasons but if it is not the case we can safely remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index d155518..aa46aa6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -218,8 +218,7 @@ void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
>
> static void hrtick_clear(struct rq *rq)
> {
> - if (hrtimer_active(&rq->hrtick_timer))
> - hrtimer_cancel(&rq->hrtick_timer);
> + hrtimer_cancel(&rq->hrtick_timer);
> }
>
> /*
May be not the patch of the century but just a gentle bump if it was
lost by more important patchset review.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists