linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 04/47] n_tty: Fix stall at n_tty_receive_char

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:24:28 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        syzbot <syzbot+18df353d7540aa6b5467@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 04/47] n_tty: Fix stall at n_tty_receive_char_special().

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>

commit 3d63b7e4ae0dc5e02d28ddd2fa1f945defc68d81 upstream.

syzbot is reporting stalls at n_tty_receive_char_special() [1]. This is
because comparison is not working as expected since ldata->read_head can
change at any moment. Mitigate this by explicitly masking with buffer size
when checking condition for "while" loops.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=3d7481a346958d9469bebbeb0537d5f056bdd6e8

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+18df353d7540aa6b5467@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Fixes: bc5a5e3f45d04784 ("n_tty: Don't wrap input buffer indices at buffer size")
Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/tty/n_tty.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
@@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct n_tty_data {
 	struct mutex output_lock;
 };
 
+#define MASK(x) ((x) & (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE - 1))
+
 static inline size_t read_cnt(struct n_tty_data *ldata)
 {
 	return ldata->read_head - ldata->read_tail;
@@ -1006,14 +1008,15 @@ static void eraser(unsigned char c, stru
 	}
 
 	seen_alnums = 0;
-	while (ldata->read_head != ldata->canon_head) {
+	while (MASK(ldata->read_head) != MASK(ldata->canon_head)) {
 		head = ldata->read_head;
 
 		/* erase a single possibly multibyte character */
 		do {
 			head--;
 			c = read_buf(ldata, head);
-		} while (is_continuation(c, tty) && head != ldata->canon_head);
+		} while (is_continuation(c, tty) &&
+			 MASK(head) != MASK(ldata->canon_head));
 
 		/* do not partially erase */
 		if (is_continuation(c, tty))
@@ -1055,7 +1058,7 @@ static void eraser(unsigned char c, stru
 				 * This info is used to go back the correct
 				 * number of columns.
 				 */
-				while (tail != ldata->canon_head) {
+				while (MASK(tail) != MASK(ldata->canon_head)) {
 					tail--;
 					c = read_buf(ldata, tail);
 					if (c == '\t') {
@@ -1332,7 +1335,7 @@ n_tty_receive_char_special(struct tty_st
 			finish_erasing(ldata);
 			echo_char(c, tty);
 			echo_char_raw('\n', ldata);
-			while (tail != ldata->read_head) {
+			while (MASK(tail) != MASK(ldata->read_head)) {
 				echo_char(read_buf(ldata, tail), tty);
 				tail++;
 			}
@@ -2479,7 +2482,7 @@ static unsigned long inq_canon(struct n_
 	tail = ldata->read_tail;
 	nr = head - tail;
 	/* Skip EOF-chars.. */
-	while (head != tail) {
+	while (MASK(head) != MASK(tail)) {
 		if (test_bit(tail & (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE - 1), ldata->read_flags) &&
 		    read_buf(ldata, tail) == __DISABLED_CHAR)
 			nr--;