lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 9 Jul 2018 21:29:04 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] objtool: move libelf detection to Kconfig from
 Makefile

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:35:16AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Currently, users are allowed to enable STACK_VALIDATION regardless
> of the compiler capability.  The top-level Makefile warns or breaks
> the build if it turns out that the host compiler cannot link libelf.
> 
> Move the libelf test to Kconfig so that users can enable the feature
> only when the host compiler can build the objtool.  The ugly check
> in the Makefile will go away.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>

Actually, looking at this again, I want to rescind my ack.

This patches changes the behavior in a subtle (but important) way.

Before, if I did "make defconfig", it would *always* choose the ORC
unwinder.  Then, if I didn't have libelf-devel, the build would fail and
it would tell me what I need to install.

But now with this patch, if I do "make defconfig", the generated config
actually changes based on what I happen to have installed on my build
system.  If I don't have libelf-devel, then it silently chooses the
non-default unwinder (frame pointer).

This is a subtle difference, but IMO it's dangerous, because it will
silently enable the frame pointer unwinder for the majority of new
systems, even though it's not the default.

I strongly prefer the original behavior, because we really want to
encourage people to use the ORC unwinder, even if that means they have
to install a package to build it.

Also -- in general -- I suspect that silently changing the defaults like
this will create a lot of bad surprises.  The output of "make defconfig"
should be predictable and not dependent on what RPMs I happen to have
installed.

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ