[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180710172157.GB10177@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:21:57 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@...co.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: make flatmem depend on !NUMA
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:16:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Building without NUMA but with FLATMEM results in a link error
> because mem_map[] is not available:
>
> aarch64-linux-ld -EB -maarch64elfb --no-undefined -X -pie -shared -Bsymbolic --no-apply-dynamic-relocs --build-id -o .tmp_vmlinux1 -T ./arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds --whole-archive built-in.a --no-whole-archive --start-group arch/arm64/lib/lib.a lib/lib.a --end-group
> init/do_mounts.o: In function `mount_block_root':
> do_mounts.c:(.init.text+0x1e8): undefined reference to `mem_map'
> arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.o: In function `vdso_init':
> vdso.c:(.init.text+0xb4): undefined reference to `mem_map'
>
> This uses the same trick as the other architectures, making flatmem
> depend on !NUMA to avoid the broken configuration.
>
> Fixes: e7d4bac428ed ("arm64: add ARM64-specific support for flatmem")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks, Arnd. I've picked this one up.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists