linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the rdma tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180710041143.GD17400@mellanox.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jul 2018 22:11:43 -0600
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the rdma tree

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:05:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 21:41:57 -0600 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com> wrote:
> > 
> > What compiler is producing these? I got nothing from 0-day build
> > service or my local gcc-7..
> 
> The x86 compiler is a v7.3.1 cross compiler hosted on PowerPC LE and
> built from sources.

Curiouser and curiouser.. Mine is

gcc version 7.3.0 (Ubuntu 7.3.0-21ubuntu1~16.04) 

> > They are false positives and I guess we need to put the
> > uninitialized_var back that was hiding them.
> 
> Rats.  :-(

Indeed.. I dislike that macro.

Jason