[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35f0b060-b3c0-528e-ee96-811f55b62635@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:43:40 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel 4.17.4 lockup
On 07/11/2018 10:29 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> I have seen it on machines with various amounts of cores and RAMs.
>> It triggers the fastest on 8 cores with 6GB RAM reliably.
> Here is the first kernel message.
Does it trigger better with more RAM or less?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists