lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35f0b060-b3c0-528e-ee96-811f55b62635@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:43:40 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Cc:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel 4.17.4 lockup

On 07/11/2018 10:29 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> I have seen it on machines with various amounts of cores and RAMs.
>> It triggers the fastest on 8 cores with 6GB RAM reliably.
> Here is the first kernel message.

Does it trigger better with more RAM or less?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ