linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/12] blk: use for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <965184f9-e5ed-3c8b-bfd7-a033a252371b@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:30:46 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] blk: use for_each_if

On 7/11/18 10:45 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:40:58AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 10:36:40AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> Makes the macros resilient against if {} else {} blocks right
>>> afterwards.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
>>> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
>>> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
>>> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>
>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>>
>> Jens, it'd probably be best to route this through block tree.
> 
> Oops, this requires an earlier patch to move the for_each_if def to a
> common header and should be routed together.

Yeah, this is a problem with the submission.

Always (ALWAYS) CC folks on at least the cover letter and generic
earlier patches. Getting just one patch sent like this is mostly
useless, and causes more harm than good.

-- 
Jens Axboe