lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:48:43 +0800
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, ashok.raj@...el.com,
        sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.y.sun@...el.com,
        jacob.jun.pan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] iommu/vt-d: Global PASID name space

On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 01:22:50PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:

[...]

> +#ifndef __INTEL_PASID_H
> +#define __INTEL_PASID_H
> +
> +#define PASID_MIN			0x1
> +#define PASID_MAX			0x20000

Could I ask whether there's a reason to explicitly use 0x20000 for the
max value?  Asked since I saw that the example in the spec gave 20
bits for PASID (please refer to spec ver 3.0 section 3.4.3 figure
3-8).  Also I believe that's what I was told by Kevin.

I saw that the old per-iommu max value is set to 0x20000, though I'm
not sure whether that's still needed since if we're going to have
two-level pasid table then AFAIU we don't need physically continuous
memory any more (though I saw that we don't yet have two-level pasid
table implemented):

	/* Eventually I'm promised we will get a multi-level PASID table
	 * and it won't have to be physically contiguous. Until then,
	 * limit the size because 8MiB contiguous allocations can be hard
	 * to come by. The limit of 0x20000, which is 1MiB for each of
	 * the PASID and PASID-state tables, is somewhat arbitrary. */
	if (iommu->pasid_max > 0x20000)
		iommu->pasid_max = 0x20000;

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ