linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] 9p: Use IDRs more effectively

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180711233659.GA5684@nautica>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jul 2018 01:37:00 +0200
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] 9p: Use IDRs more effectively

Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2018:
> The 9p code doesn't take advantage of the IDR's ability to store
> a pointer.  We can actually get rid of the p9_idpool abstraction
> and the multi-dimensional array of requests.
> 
> v2: Address feedback from Dominique.

Thanks, I've picked them up for 4.19
 ( git://github.com/martinetd/linux 9p-next as per mail on
 v9fs-developer list, "Current 9P patches - test branch")

This shouldn't stop anyone else from doing more reviews/test, I'm doing
this 9p-patch-gathering on no autority and I've only checked very basic
things for now.

-- 
Dominique Martinet