[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v66vU4gBewGjLL-Ohx6mvKOVu4dDdwKNsXrkr3nZsSq3Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:11:56 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/18] drm/sun4i: mixer: Read id from DT
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net> wrote:
> Currently, TCON supports 2 ways to match TCON with engine (mixer in this
> case). Old way is to just traverse of graph backwards and compare node
> pointer. New way is to match TCON and engine by their respective ids.
> All SoCs with DE2 enabled till now used the old way, which means mixer
> id was never used and thus never implemented.
>
> However, for R40, only the new way will be used. To prepare for that,
> implement mixer id fetching from DT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
> index aa81b9838ae8..4bd4d8ccb34f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/component.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_graph.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
>
> #include "sun4i_drv.h"
> @@ -322,6 +323,42 @@ static struct regmap_config sun8i_mixer_regmap_config = {
> .max_register = 0xbfffc, /* guessed */
> };
>
> +static int sun8i_mixer_of_get_id(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + struct device_node *port, *ep;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* output is port 1 */
> + port = of_graph_get_port_by_id(node, 1);
> + if (!port)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* try to find downstream endpoint */
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(port, ep) {
> + struct device_node *remote;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + remote = of_graph_get_remote_endpoint(ep);
> + if (!remote)
> + continue;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(remote, "reg", ®);
> + if (!ret) {
> + of_node_put(remote);
> + of_node_put(ep);
> + of_node_put(port);
> +
> + return reg;
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(remote);
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(port);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
The above looks good.
> static int sun8i_mixer_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> void *data)
> {
> @@ -353,8 +390,7 @@ static int sun8i_mixer_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, mixer);
> mixer->engine.ops = &sun8i_engine_ops;
> mixer->engine.node = dev->of_node;
> - /* The ID of the mixer currently doesn't matter */
> - mixer->engine.id = -1;
> + mixer->engine.id = sun8i_mixer_of_get_id(dev->of_node);
Should you be handling error codes?
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists