[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxgQs3D+2wDjB8F8EotWwJx5MayYBjSe11DpHWbAO_5Tfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 08:43:31 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 15/42] lift fput() on late failures into path_openat()
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:21 AM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
[...]
> @@ -3407,8 +3407,6 @@ static int do_last(struct nameidata *nd,
> if (!error && will_truncate)
> error = handle_truncate(file);
> out:
> - if (unlikely(error) && (*opened & FILE_OPENED))
> - fput(file);
> if (unlikely(error > 0)) {
> WARN_ON(1);
Another opportunity to squash WARN_ON(1) with condition.
> error = -EINVAL;
> @@ -3484,8 +3482,6 @@ static int do_tmpfile(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags,
> if (error)
> goto out2;
> error = open_check_o_direct(file);
> - if (error)
> - fput(file);
> out2:
> mnt_drop_write(path.mnt);
> out:
> @@ -3547,20 +3543,20 @@ static struct file *path_openat(struct nameidata *nd,
> }
> terminate_walk(nd);
> out2:
> - if (!(opened & FILE_OPENED)) {
> - BUG_ON(!error);
> - fput(file);
> + if (likely(!error)) {
> + if (likely(opened & FILE_OPENED))
> + return file;
> + WARN_ON(1);
This style may be open for debate but:
if (!WARN_ON(!(opened & FILE_OPENED)))
return file;
Maybe we need WARN_UNLESS() or WARN_ASSERT()
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists