| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180711065338.3ka4yibxkawgo4fd@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 08:53:38 +0200
From: "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
Cc: Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] dmaengine: imx-sdma: support dmatest
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:37:02AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vinod [mailto:vkoul@...nel.org]
> > Sent: 2018年7月10日 23:33
> > To: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> > Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com; shawnguo@...nel.org;
> > s.hauer@...gutronix.de; Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>;
> > linux@...linux.org.uk; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> > kernel@...gutronix.de; dmaengine@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] dmaengine: imx-sdma: support dmatest
> >
> > On 11-07-18, 00:23, Robin Gong wrote:
> > > dmatest(memcpy) will never call dmaengine_slave_config before prep,
> >
> > and that should have been a hint to you that you should not expect that
> >
> > > so jobs in dmaengine_slave_config need to be moved into somewhere
> > > before device_prep_dma_memcpy. Besides, dmatest never setup chan
> > > ->private as other common case like uart/audio/spi will always setup
> > > chan->private. Here check it to judge if it's dmatest case and do
> > > jobs in slave_config.
> >
> > and you should not do anything for dmatest. Supporting it means memcpy
> > implementation is not correct :)
> Okay, I will any word about dmatest here since memcpy assume no calling
> slave_config.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c index
> > > ed2267d..48f3749 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > > @@ -1222,10 +1222,36 @@ static int sdma_alloc_chan_resources(struct
> > > dma_chan *chan) {
> > > struct sdma_channel *sdmac = to_sdma_chan(chan);
> > > struct imx_dma_data *data = chan->private;
> > > + struct imx_dma_data default_data;
> > > int prio, ret;
> > >
> > > - if (!data)
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > + ret = clk_enable(sdmac->sdma->clk_ipg);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + ret = clk_enable(sdmac->sdma->clk_ahb);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto disable_clk_ipg;
> > > + /*
> > > + * dmatest(memcpy) will never call dmaengine_slave_config before prep,
> > > + * so jobs in dmaengine_slave_config need to be moved into somewhere
> > > + * before device_prep_dma_memcpy. Besides, dmatest never setup chan
> > > + * ->private as other common cases like uart/audio/spi will setup
> > > + * chan->private always. Here check it to judge if it's dmatest case
> > > + * and do jobs in slave_config.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!data) {
> > > + dev_warn(sdmac->sdma->dev, "dmatest is running?\n");
> >
> > why is that a warning!
> Current SDMA driver assume filter function to set chan->private with specific data
> (struct imx_dma_data dma_data)like below (sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c):
> static bool filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
> {
> if (!imx_dma_is_general_purpose(chan))
> return false;
> chan->private = param;
> return true;
> }
>
> But in memcpy case, at lease dmatest case, no chan->private set in its filter function.
> So here take dmatest a special case and do some prepare jobs for memcpy. But if the
> Upper device driver call dma_request_channel() with their specific filter without
> 'chan->private' setting in the future. The warning message is a useful hint to them to
> Add 'chan->private' in filter function. Or doc it somewhere?
Instead of doing heuristics to guess whether we are doing memcpy you
could instead make memcpy the default when slave_config is not called,
i.e. drop the if (!data) check completely.
> >
> > > + sdmac->word_size = sdmac->sdma->dma_device.copy_align;
> > > + default_data.priority = 2;
> > > + default_data.peripheral_type = IMX_DMATYPE_MEMORY;
> > > + default_data.dma_request = 0;
> > > + default_data.dma_request2 = 0;
> > > + data = &default_data;
> > > +
> > > + sdma_config_ownership(sdmac, false, true, false);
> > > + sdma_get_pc(sdmac, IMX_DMATYPE_MEMORY);
> > > + sdma_load_context(sdmac);
> > > + }
> >
> > this needs to be default for memcpy
The problem seems to be that we do not know whether we are doing memcpy
or not. Normally we get the information how a channel is to be
configured in dma_device->device_config, but this function is not called
in the memcpy case.
An alternative might also be to do the setup in dma_device->device_prep_dma_memcpy.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists