[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <62933fa6-542c-6fc1-354c-51597d5523ef@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:22:32 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
alexis.berlemont@...il.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, ralf@...ux-mips.org, paul.burton@...s.com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference
count (semaphore)
Minor correction:
On 07/11/2018 02:14 PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
> Third options: How about allowing 0 as a special value for reference
> counter?
s/reference counter/reference counter offset/
I mean allow uprobe_register() and uprobe_register_refctr()
> in parallel but do not allow two uprobe_register_refctr() with two
> different reference counter.
Ditto.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists