Message-ID: <20180711021826.GA2359@xz-mi>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:18:26 +0800
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, ashok.raj@...el.com,
        sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.y.sun@...el.com,
        jacob.jun.pan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] iommu/vt-d: Per PCI device pasid table interfaces

On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 01:22:55PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> This patch adds the interfaces for per PCI device pasid
> table management. Currently we allocate one pasid table
> for all PCI devices under the scope of an IOMMU. It's
> insecure in some cases where multiple devices under one
> single IOMMU unit support PASID features. With per PCI
> device pasid table, we can achieve finer protection and
> isolation granularity.
> 
> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> Cc: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Suggested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c |   1 +
>  drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c | 178 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h |  18 +++++
>  drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c   |   4 -
>  include/linux/intel-iommu.h |   2 +
>  5 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index 3d802c5..a930918 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -2450,6 +2450,7 @@ static struct dmar_domain *dmar_insert_one_dev_info(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>  	info->dev = dev;
>  	info->domain = domain;
>  	info->iommu = iommu;
> +	info->pasid_table = NULL;
>  
>  	if (dev && dev_is_pci(dev)) {
>  		struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(info->dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> index e918fe0..1b61942 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>  #include <linux/intel-iommu.h>
>  #include <linux/iommu.h>
>  #include <linux/memory.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/pci-ats.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  
>  #include "intel-pasid.h"
> @@ -58,3 +60,179 @@ void *intel_pasid_lookup_id(int pasid)
>  
>  	return p;
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Per device pasid table management:
> + */
> +static inline void
> +device_attach_pasid_table(struct device_domain_info *info,
> +			  struct pasid_table *pasid_table)
> +{
> +	info->pasid_table = pasid_table;
> +	list_add(&info->table, &pasid_table->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +device_detach_pasid_table(struct device_domain_info *info,
> +			  struct pasid_table *pasid_table)
> +{
> +	info->pasid_table = NULL;
> +	list_del(&info->table);
> +}
> +
> +struct pasid_table_opaque {
> +	struct pasid_table	**pasid_table;
> +	int			segment;
> +	int			bus;
> +	int			devfn;
> +};
> +
> +static int search_pasid_table(struct device_domain_info *info, void *opaque)
> +{
> +	struct pasid_table_opaque *data = opaque;
> +
> +	if (info->iommu->segment == data->segment &&
> +	    info->bus == data->bus &&
> +	    info->devfn == data->devfn &&
> +	    info->pasid_table) {
> +		*data->pasid_table = info->pasid_table;
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int get_alias_pasid_table(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *opaque)
> +{
> +	struct pasid_table_opaque *data = opaque;
> +
> +	data->segment = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
> +	data->bus = PCI_BUS_NUM(alias);
> +	data->devfn = alias & 0xff;
> +
> +	return for_each_device_domain(&search_pasid_table, data);
> +}
> +
> +int intel_pasid_alloc_table(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct device_domain_info *info;
> +	struct pasid_table *pasid_table;
> +	struct pasid_table_opaque data;
> +	struct page *pages;
> +	size_t size, count;
> +	int ret, order;
> +
> +	info = dev->archdata.iommu;
> +	if (WARN_ON(!info || !dev_is_pci(dev) ||
> +		    !info->pasid_supported || info->pasid_table))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* DMA alias device already has a pasid table, use it: */
> +	data.pasid_table = &pasid_table;
> +	ret = pci_for_each_dma_alias(to_pci_dev(dev),
> +				     &get_alias_pasid_table, &data);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto attach_out;
> +
> +	pasid_table = kzalloc(sizeof(*pasid_table), GFP_ATOMIC);

Do we need to take some lock here (e.g., the pasid lock)?  Otherwise
what if two devices (that are sharing the same DMA alias) call the
function intel_pasid_alloc_table() concurrently, then could it
possible that we create one table for each of the device while AFAIU
we should let them share a single pasid table?

> +	if (!pasid_table)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pasid_table->dev);
> +
> +	size = sizeof(struct pasid_entry);
> +	count = min_t(int, pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)), intel_pasid_max_id);
> +	order = get_order(size * count);
> +	pages = alloc_pages_node(info->iommu->node,
> +				 GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO,
> +				 order);
> +	if (!pages)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pasid_table->table = page_address(pages);
> +	pasid_table->order = order;
> +	pasid_table->max_pasid = count;
> +
> +attach_out:
> +	device_attach_pasid_table(info, pasid_table);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void intel_pasid_free_table(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct device_domain_info *info;
> +	struct pasid_table *pasid_table;
> +
> +	info = dev->archdata.iommu;
> +	if (!info || !dev_is_pci(dev) ||
> +	    !info->pasid_supported || !info->pasid_table)
> +		return;
> +
> +	pasid_table = info->pasid_table;
> +	device_detach_pasid_table(info, pasid_table);
> +
> +	if (!list_empty(&pasid_table->dev))
> +		return;

Same question to here: do we need a lock?

> +
> +	free_pages((unsigned long)pasid_table->table, pasid_table->order);
> +	kfree(pasid_table);
> +}
> +
> +struct pasid_table *intel_pasid_get_table(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct device_domain_info *info;
> +
> +	info = dev->archdata.iommu;
> +	if (!info)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return info->pasid_table;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_pasid_get_dev_max_id(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct device_domain_info *info;
> +
> +	info = dev->archdata.iommu;
> +	if (!info || !info->pasid_table)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return info->pasid_table->max_pasid;
> +}
> +
> +struct pasid_entry *intel_pasid_get_entry(struct device *dev, int pasid)
> +{
> +	struct pasid_table *pasid_table;
> +	struct pasid_entry *entries;
> +
> +	pasid_table = intel_pasid_get_table(dev);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!pasid_table || pasid < 0 ||
> +		    pasid >= intel_pasid_get_dev_max_id(dev)))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	entries = pasid_table->table;
> +
> +	return &entries[pasid];
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Interfaces for PASID table entry manipulation:
> + */
> +static void sm_pasid_clear_entry(struct pasid_entry *pe)
> +{
> +	memset(pe, 0, sizeof(struct pasid_entry));

[1]

> +}
> +
> +void intel_pasid_clear_entry(struct device *dev, int pasid)
> +{
> +	struct pasid_entry *pe;
> +
> +	pe = intel_pasid_get_entry(dev, pasid);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!pe))
> +		return;
> +
> +	sm_pasid_clear_entry(pe);
> +
> +	/* Make sure the entry update is visible before translation. */
> +	wmb();

Pure question: AFAIU wmb only orders write operation, then do we
really need it here?  Instead from the comment I feel like what we
really need is a WRITE_ONCE() at [1].  Am I wrong somewhere?

Thanks,

> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h
> index d5feb3d..1fb5e12 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h
> @@ -13,9 +13,27 @@
>  #define PASID_MIN			0x1
>  #define PASID_MAX			0x20000
>  
> +struct pasid_entry {
> +	u64 val;
> +};
> +
> +/* The representative of a PASID table */
> +struct pasid_table {
> +	void			*table;		/* pasid table pointer */
> +	int			order;		/* page order of pasid table */
> +	int			max_pasid;	/* max pasid */
> +	struct list_head	dev;		/* device list */
> +};
> +
>  extern u32 intel_pasid_max_id;
>  int intel_pasid_alloc_id(void *ptr, int start, int end, gfp_t gfp);
>  void intel_pasid_free_id(int pasid);
>  void *intel_pasid_lookup_id(int pasid);
> +int intel_pasid_alloc_table(struct device *dev);
> +void intel_pasid_free_table(struct device *dev);
> +struct pasid_table *intel_pasid_get_table(struct device *dev);
> +int intel_pasid_get_dev_max_id(struct device *dev);
> +struct pasid_entry *intel_pasid_get_entry(struct device *dev, int pasid);
> +void intel_pasid_clear_entry(struct device *dev, int pasid);
>  
>  #endif /* __INTEL_PASID_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> index 56e65d0..9b5dc72 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> @@ -34,10 +34,6 @@
>  
>  static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d);
>  
> -struct pasid_entry {
> -	u64 val;
> -};
> -
>  struct pasid_state_entry {
>  	u64 val;
>  };
> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> index 4fd4c6f..e7901d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ struct intel_iommu {
>  struct device_domain_info {
>  	struct list_head link;	/* link to domain siblings */
>  	struct list_head global; /* link to global list */
> +	struct list_head table;	/* link to pasid table */
>  	u8 bus;			/* PCI bus number */
>  	u8 devfn;		/* PCI devfn number */
>  	u16 pfsid;		/* SRIOV physical function source ID */
> @@ -489,6 +490,7 @@ struct device_domain_info {
>  	struct device *dev; /* it's NULL for PCIe-to-PCI bridge */
>  	struct intel_iommu *iommu; /* IOMMU used by this device */
>  	struct dmar_domain *domain; /* pointer to domain */
> +	struct pasid_table *pasid_table; /* pasid table */
>  };
>  
>  static inline void __iommu_flush_cache(
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

-- 
Peter Xu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists