[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180711090003.42596c2b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:00:03 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Glexiner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use
SRCU
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:49:54 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:21:46AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > - it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \
>
> I would convert to rcu_dereference_raw() to appease sparse. The fancy
> stuff below is pointless if you then turn off all checking.
The problem with doing this is if we use a trace event without the
proper _idle() or whatever, we wont get a warning that it is used
incorrectly with lockdep. Or does lockdep still check if "rcu is
watching" with rcu_dereference_raw()?
-- Steve
>
> > + \
> > + /* \
> > + * For rcuidle callers, use srcu since sched-rcu \
> > + * doesn't work from the idle path. \
> > + */ \
> > + if (rcuidle) { \
> > + if (in_nmi()) { \
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); \
> > + return; /* no srcu from nmi */ \
> > + } \
> > + \
> > + idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu); \
> > + it_func_ptr = \
> > + srcu_dereference_notrace((tp)->funcs, \
> > + &tracepoint_srcu); \
> > + /* To keep it consistent with !rcuidle path */ \
> > + preempt_disable_notrace(); \
> > + } else { \
> > + rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \
> > + it_func_ptr = \
> > + rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \
> > + } \
Powered by blists - more mailing lists