[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180711093346.782af07a@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:33:46 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] arm64: fpsimd: use a local_lock() in addition to
local_bh_disable()
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:31:57 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On 2018-07-11 09:25:55 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Did you decide to create a local_lock_bh(lock) function? I don't see it.
> >
> > And should this be backported to 4.14-rt too? You state you saw this in
> > 4.16-rt, but did you start doing something different then, or did the
> > kernel change?
>
> I wanted to re-evaluate the whole situation here but didn't get to it
> yet.
Thanks, I wont add this then.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists