lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:42:34 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: drivers: set clockevent device cpumask
 to cpu_possible_mask

Hi Daniel,

On 11/07/18 12:36, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/07/2018 13:24, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Currently, quite a few clockevent devices have cpumask set to
>> cpu_all_mask which should be fine. However, cpu_possible_mask is more
>> accurate and if there are any other clockevent devices in the system
>> which have cpumask set to cpu_possible_mask, then having cpu_all_mask
>> may result in issues (mostly boot hang with forever loops in
>> clockevents_notify_released).
>>
>> So, lets replace all the clockevent device cpu_all_mask to
>> cpu_possible_mask in order to prevent above mentioned possible issue.
>>
>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
>> Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>> ---
> 
> Applied, thanks for the fix.
> 

Thomas was planning to take this, see [1]
-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.1807102220320.1588@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ